HomeColumnsBackground to Zim’s armed struggle: Part Two...as Rhodesian Front persecuted nationalists

Background to Zim’s armed struggle: Part Two…as Rhodesian Front persecuted nationalists

Published on

THE African nationalists rejected the outcome of the Constitutional Conference which opened in London on December 16 1960 and boycotted the referendum held on July 26 1961 to accept or reject the resultant Constitution. 

The white electorate approved it and the National Democratic Party (NDP) was subsequently banned on December 9 1961.

The banned NDP morphed into the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU) on December 19 1961.

On the parallel side, the white supremacists fronting Rhodesian nationalism split from the governing United Federal Party (UFP) and Dominion Party; on March 1 1962 the settlers formed the Rhodesian Front under Winston Field, Ian Smith and Clifford Dupont. 

ZAPU was banned in September 1962 and thereafter operated as the People’s Caretaker Council (PCC).

On the other hand, the eight-month old white supremacist Rhodesian Front won the Southern Rhodesian December 1962 elections, formed a militant white supremacist government and immediately amended the Law and Order Maintenance Act (LOMA) to include mandatory death sentence for saboteurs (African freedom fighters). 

That is how determined the white settlers were to oppose black majority rule. 

From then on, the stage was set for military confrontation or otherwise the armed liberation struggle. 

Meanwhile, it was not all bad luck for the African nationalists. 

The newly decolonised African States up north formed the Organisation of African Unity (OAU, now African Union [AU]) on May 25 1963 and made a commitment to liberate the remaining colonised African States.  

A six-man ZAPU team attended the Addis Ababa launch to lobby the continental body’s support and was advised to go back and organise as well as show more commitment as a condition for support. 

On the home front, the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland was dissolved by June 28 1963 at Victoria Falls Conference and would end in December. 

Nyasaland would get her independence and become Malawi in July 1964. 

Northern Rhodesia would also get her independence and become Zambia in October the same year. 

By the same token, the nationalists had expected Southern Rhodesia to become independent Zimbabwe but that was not to be because the Rhodesian Front hardliners had already taken over. 

Instead, Southern Rhodesia got the lion’s share of the federation’s arsenal. 

The implications of militarily strengthening Southern Rhodesia at the dissolution of the federation was not lost to the hardliners in ZAPU then disguised as PCC. 

In a move echoing the Rhodesian hardliners’ split from mainstream Rhodesian parties to form the Rhodesian Front, the nationalist hardliners split from ZAPU and on August 8 1963, launched ZANU ‘on the very slogan of confrontation’. 

Joshua Nkomo had preferred the moderate stance of isolating Rhodesia politically and economically through international community pressure on Britain. 

But for the hardliners, as told by Herbert Chitepo, ‘the time had come to acquire modern weapons’.

ZANU was launched at Enos Nkala’s Highfield house with Ndabaningi Sithole as president and Leopold Takawira as his deputy. Shortly after, Cde Emmerson Mnangagwa (now President) led the first squad of ZANLA recruits for guerilla training in China. 

In April 1964, following the sentencing of the late militant former President Robert Mugabe to detention, the Rhodesian Front replaced Winston Field with Second World War veteran Ian Smith who wasted no time in ensuring that by August, both ZANU and PCC (ZAPU) had been banned, while almost the whole of the internal nationalist leadership, inclusive of Cde Joshua Nkomo and Sithole, were jailed. 

On October 24 1964, Northern Rhodesia became independent Zambia and the imprisoned ZANU Central Committee asked Cde Chitepo to lead the external wing and organise armed struggle from there. 

At the same time, the Rhodesian Front pressed on for independence from Britain as an option to black majority rule. 

British premier Harold Wilson ‘attempted’ to stop the Rhodesian Front from making a unilateral declaration of independence (UDI). 

His insincerity was given away when he told the imprisoned nationalists that no military intervention would be made against Smith in the event that he made the declaration. 

That assurance was what Smith had needed to make UDI a reality on November 11 1965. 

He called it a ‘victory of Western Christian civilisation’. 

Ex-Southern Rhodesia Premier Garfield Todd perfectly defined the scandal with the words: “If a blackman had been in charge of the Government in 1965 and he had 270 000 black followers and these people were keeping six million whites in subjection, and he broke away from Britain so as to keep them for 

1 000 years under black rule, the freedom-loving countries of Britain and Europe and America would have fixed it up in a week.” 

In reply, ZANU, which had been launched ‘on the very slogan of confrontation’, fired the first shots of the armed liberation struggle in the Chinhoyi Battle of April 28 1966. 

It was exactly 68 years after Mbuya Nehanda’s hanging on April 27 1898.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest articles

Plot to derail debt restructuring talks

THE US has been caught in yet another embarrassing plot to grab the limelight...

US onslaught on Zim continues

By Elizabeth Sitotombe THERE was nothing surprising about Tendai Biti’s decision to abandon the opposition's...

Mineral wealth a definition of Independence

ZIMBABWE’S independence and freedom cannot be fully explained without mentioning one of the key...

Let the Uhuru celebrations begin

By Kundai Marunya The Independence Flame has departed Harare’s Kopje area for a tour of...

More like this

Plot to derail debt restructuring talks

THE US has been caught in yet another embarrassing plot to grab the limelight...

US onslaught on Zim continues

By Elizabeth Sitotombe THERE was nothing surprising about Tendai Biti’s decision to abandon the opposition's...

Mineral wealth a definition of Independence

ZIMBABWE’S independence and freedom cannot be fully explained without mentioning one of the key...

Discover more from Celebrating Being Zimbabwean

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading