HomeColumnsBackground to Zim’s armed struggle...rise of African nationalism

Background to Zim’s armed struggle…rise of African nationalism

Published on

THE end of the Second World War brought with it ‘winds of change’, one of which was the rise of militant African Nationalism – a communal desire for self-determination, sovereignty, self-rule or independence based on shared social characteristics of culture, ethnicity, geographic location, language, politics, religion, traditions and belief in a shared singular history. 

In Zimbabwe, it would be the third coming of militant nationalism. 

In the 1690s, a similar militant nationalism led by Changamire Dombo had destroyed Portuguese imperialism in Zimbabwe. 

In the 1890s, the First Chimurenga had been a more encompassing militant expression of nationalism, uniting all indigenous Zimbabweans to resist British colonial occupation. 

The term ‘Chimurenga’ was derived from ‘Murenga’ the godfather of Zimbabwe. 

In real life, Murenga had fathered Nehanda, Chaminuka, Mushawetu, Runji and other less prominent personalities. 

It is Charwe, the spirit medium of Nehanda, who led the resistance to colonial occupation in collaboration with the spirit mediums of Mukwati and Kaguvi, among others. 

But the ‘call-to-arms’ that ‘nationalised’ the resistance was Murenga’s name. 

It is necessary to state that the nationalists of the First Chimurenga lost the war and the land to the modern weapons used by the British invaders.

The rise of the African nationalism that sustained the armed liberation struggle was, in general, promoted by the UN Universal Human Rights Charter, which was an important result of the Second World War. 

The charter legitimised self-determination as an inalienable universal human right and required that no people should be forced to resort to armed liberation struggle to achieve it.  

Self-determination simply meant that people had a right to chart or ‘determine’ their own destiny. 

The resultant creation of the Jewish State of Israel by the colonisers of Africa had the unintended effect of inviting embarrassing comparisons in their colonies.

Post Second World War, Zimbabwean nationalism came with an urban industrial labour factor that is important to recognise. 

It did not have the militant beginnings of the first two struggles. 

It started with trade unionist agitation led by the likes of Benjamin Burombo who got trade union experience working in South Africa and returned to Bulawayo and formed the British African National Voice Association (aka African Workers Voice Association) in 1947. 

It played a critical part in the 1948 general strike and the campaign against the 1951 Native Land Husbandry Act.

Joshua Nkomo, who started as a Methodist Church lay preacher, followed Benjamin Burombo’s trade unionist footprints and reportedly emerged a skillful negotiator. Then it became political agitation for inclusive constitutional reform characterised by peaceful demonstrations and boycotts. 

This was consistent with the decolonisation mode being implemented up north; a mode involving a gradual increase in African representation until black majority Government was achieved.

By coincidence, missionary education was hatching its first university graduates in the persons of Joshua Nkomo, Ndabaningi Sithole, Samuel Parirenyatwa, Herbert Chitepo, Robert Mugabe and Josiah Chinamano, among others. 

Their periods of study in foreign universities, particularly Fort Hare and Natal, had exposed them to African nationalism that had already taken root in South Africa which had been colonised for over two centuries. 

Many of them became members of local nationalist movements, the main one being the African National Congress (ANC). 

It was obviously an unintended development, not consistent with how missionaries had paved the way for colonisation. 

The schools that ‘educated’ the nationalists had been established as centres of colonial subversion and not the nurseries of anti-colonial movements rallying around ancestral spirits (midzimu yenyika).

When the student nationalists returned home, they formed similar organisations in preparation for independence which, for black Africa, was going to start with Ghana up north in 1957.  

The formation of the 1956 Salisbury-based City Youth League, led by James Chikerema, was the notable first development in that direction. 

The League did not request recognition of black claims to equality and the same standard of life as that of the Europeans. 

Instead, it challenged European authority and successfully organised a boycott of the buses that carried Africans from townships to work.  

Originally owned by blacks, the service had been taken over by whites who had raised the fares. 

The boycott forced the Government to subsidise fares.

When Nkomo launched Zimbabwe’s own African National Congress in September 1957, the merger with Chikerema’s City Youth League contested the injustices inherent in the Land Apportionment Act and Native Land Husbandry Act.

The infamous Law and Order Maintenance Act was introduced to curb the growing nationalist agitation. 

The Act allowed arrest and detention of nationalists without trial.

The ANC was incidentally banned in 1959 and among the 500 members arrested and detained were Chikerema and George Nyandoro. 

The pattern to all future challenges to European authority was established then. 

It would be: ‘ban’ … ‘detain’ … ‘confiscate funds and equipment’.

The ANC was replaced by the Nkomo-led National Democratic Party (NDP) on January 1 1960. 

Notables among the leadership of the party were Ndabaningi Sithole, Herbert Chitepo, Robert Mugabe and Leopold Takawira.  

The year 1960 was going to witness a remarkable decolonisation of 17 African states up north and, because of it, the encouraged nationalists’ demand became: “We are no longer asking Europeans to rule us well. We now want to rule ourselves.” 

The NDP demanded the abolition of the Constitution which automatically produced discriminatory laws and the chance came with the Constitutional Conference which opened in London on December 16 1960. 

Meanwhile, an interesting parallel development to African nationalism was an exclusive racist Rhodie pseudo-nationalism that also agitated for white settler-independence from Britain. 

The leaders included Ian Smith who was MP for Gwanda and Chief Whip for the governing United Federal Party (UFP) in the Federal Assembly. 

Their argument was that they deserved independence more than the African nationalists because they had had the experience of self-government since 1923. 

The lobbyists were determined to extinguish the fire of African nationalism.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest articles

Leonard Dembo: The untold story 

By Fidelis Manyange  LAST week, Wednesday, April 9, marked exactly 28 years since the death...

Unpacking the political economy of poverty 

IN 1990, soon after his release from prison, Nelson Mandela, while visiting in the...

Second Republic walks the talk on sport

By Lovemore Boora  THE Second Republic has thrown its weight behind the Sport and Recreation...

What is ‘truth’?: Part Three . . . can there still be salvation for Africans 

By Nthungo YaAfrika  TRUTH takes no prisoners.  Truth is bitter and undemocratic.  Truth has no feelings, is...

More like this

Leonard Dembo: The untold story 

By Fidelis Manyange  LAST week, Wednesday, April 9, marked exactly 28 years since the death...

Unpacking the political economy of poverty 

IN 1990, soon after his release from prison, Nelson Mandela, while visiting in the...

Second Republic walks the talk on sport

By Lovemore Boora  THE Second Republic has thrown its weight behind the Sport and Recreation...

Discover more from Celebrating Being Zimbabwean

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading