HomeOld_PostsWestern theories of development, slave modelling: Part One...a critique of self-serving modernisation...

Western theories of development, slave modelling: Part One…a critique of self-serving modernisation model

Published on

PRECEDING instalments have clearly shown you how Western theories of literature are ideological tools justifying Western grip on African mind-sets with a tacit purpose of laying permanent siege on African resources.
As Karl Marx indicated, the ruling class ideas are the ruling ideas.
Just as in the beginning, when word (logos) was used to create reality, those who control ideas continue to shape the world their way. And just as imperialists used theories of literature to shape our worldview, they also fashioned theories of development to preach a type of development that suits them, not us, at all times; and they have had the guts and temerity to prescribe these development models for us through the education systems they have planted in our middle.
Let us sit down again and expose these lies for what they really are.
This set discusses how Western development theories have developed in succession and how, to a great extent, the succeeding theories build upon the strengths and weaknesses of preceding theories.
Classic theories of economic development form the corpus of early historical and intellectual theorisation on why development does or fails to take place.
This essay examines these foundation theories, demonstrating how each offers valuable insights into the nature of development planning and process as well as how later theories ‘recycle’ some elements of these earlier ‘paradigms’.
It also interrogates the validity of such theories to sub-Saharan Africa.
According to Conyers and Hill (1984), development is gradual change progressing through a series of stages towards some state of expansion, improvement or completeness.
In the words of Todaro and Smith (2003: p.110) development must be perceived as:
“A multi-dimensional process involving the (re)organisation and (re)orientation of entire economic and social systems.
In addition to improvements in incomes and output, it typically involves radical changes in institutional, social and administrative structures as well as in popular attitudes and, in many cases, even customs and beliefs.”
Todaro and Smith’s definition is more illuminating in that it takes development beyond the economic to encompass the social, political and cultural spheres as well.
According to Omuta (1986), ‘planning’ is a means to an end.
Conyers (1984) says it is a continuous process involving decisions or choices about alternative ways of using available resources to achieve desired goals at some time in the future.
Davidoff and Reiner (in (ed) Faludi 1991:11) argue that ‘planning is a set of procedures – a process for determining appropriate future action through a sequence of choices’.
From these definitions, it is clear that planning incorporates a notion of goals towards which specific/action should be directed.
Action is therefore the eventual outcome of planning efforts.
The question that however, arises with regard to development in Africa is: Who does planning for the development of the sub-continent, and with what effects?
Development planning is therefore planning to achieve development where development is used in the sense of a state of being, and planning as a means of attaining this state. Development becomes the goal of the planning process.
A theory is an idea or a set of ideas used to explain something.
Thus a theory of planning must be directed to problems of effectuation, that is, the process of selecting ends and criteria, the identification of alternatives consistent with the general perspectives and the guidance of action towards determined ends.
The point that needs emphasis here though is: If ideally a theory must arise out of the imperatives of a particular situation, how many of the development theories have arisen out of the imperatives of the African situation; and if they have been developed elsewhere, to what extent can they address the developmental needs of Africa?
Todaro and Smith (2003) observe that the post-Second World War literature on economic development is dominated by four major competing theories, all developed outside Africa.
These are the linear-stages of growth model (modernisation theory); theories and patterns of structural change; the international dependence revolution (dependency theory) and the neo-classical, free-market counter-revolution (SAPs).
The modernisation theory is associated with Walt Rostow, Harrod-Domar and others. Walt Whitman Rostow (October 7 1916 – February 13 2003) was an American economist and political theorist who served as special assistant for national security affairs to US President Lyndon Johnson.
Rostow also served as a major adviser on national security affairs under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations.
He is well-known for his role in the shaping of American foreign policy during the 1960s. He was a staunch supporter of capitalism and free enterprise.
He wrote extensively in defence of free enterprise economics, particularly in developing nations.
Rostow was famous especially for writing the book The Stages of Economic Growth: A non-communist manifesto (1960) which became a classic text in several fields of social sciences.
In the 1950s, Rostow argued development is a linear path along which all countries travel towards economic growth.
Their theory is primarily an economic theory of development in which the right quantity and mixture of saving, investment and foreign aid were all that was necessary for the developing nations to proceed along an economic growth continuum that historically had been followed by more developed countries.
According to Rostow, the continuum has five stages:
l The first is the traditional society characterised by primitive lifestyles, low technology, hence low production and high dependence on subsistence agriculture.
l The second stage is the pre-conditions for take-off.
This is supposedly characterised by attitude changes, emergency of technology and involvement in modern science and new technology.
l The take-off stage is the third.
It is characterised by rapid industrial expansion. At this stage, Rostow notes that savings in national income rises to over 10 percent; investment doubles and exceeds 10 percent as attitudes and institutions are now geared towards industrial growth.
l The fourth stage is called drive to maturity and it is characterised by rapid change of economic structures as technology spreads to all areas of the economy.
l This is inevitably followed by the final stage, the stage of high mass consumption, characterised by mature economies in which there is security, highest welfare and leisure; in short, where basic needs are no longer a problem.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest articles

Kariba Municipality commits to President’s service delivery blueprint

By Kundai Marunya IT is rare to find opposition-controlled urban councils throwing their weight on...

The resurgence of Theileriosis in 2024 

THE issues of global changes, climate change and tick-borne diseases cannot be ignored, given...

Britain haunted by its hostile policy on Zimbabwe

TWO critical lessons drawn from the recent debate on Zimbabwe in the British House...

The contentious issue of race

 By Nthungo YaAfrika AS much as Africans would want to have closure to many of...

More like this

Kariba Municipality commits to President’s service delivery blueprint

By Kundai Marunya IT is rare to find opposition-controlled urban councils throwing their weight on...

The resurgence of Theileriosis in 2024 

THE issues of global changes, climate change and tick-borne diseases cannot be ignored, given...

Britain haunted by its hostile policy on Zimbabwe

TWO critical lessons drawn from the recent debate on Zimbabwe in the British House...

Discover more from Celebrating Being Zimbabwean

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading