HomeOld_PostsEuropean immigration nations: Part Three...whites use Darwin’s theory to justify racism

European immigration nations: Part Three…whites use Darwin’s theory to justify racism

Published on

THE Caucasian whites, since the Eugenics and Darwinism eras, have given in to the thought that their violence against the unsuspecting indigenous people of the earth, who are mostly black, is a sign that they are somewhat dominant.
Charles Darwin, whose work was very unscientific, said the weaker race must be overcome by the stronger just as the larger beetles feed on smaller beetles.
For the most part, beetles do not eat each other with some specialising in disposing fecal matter, others’ bones and others’ fruits.
Darwin was ignorant as well as racist and his work is full of bias.
He saw similarities between apes and humans and drew the conclusion that humans came from apes without any justifiable evidence.
He found no archeological evidence in the form of ape or human fossil remains that back up his hypothesis and drawings.
Humans have and always had a genetic make-up which produces humans and apes always had their own.
The differences among humans that occurred with climatic adaptation and mutation only caused racial diversity.
Our species is unique from all other animals in terms of walking erect, absence of fur and a tail, speech ability and so on. Genetics prove that it has, and will, always be that way.
No form of evolution can turn a specie into another specie because the bio synthesis of an organism is based on its genetic codes which are passed down through reproduction.
It is the theory of evolution which led whites to believe they are the new and evolved race which in turn had to make obsolete the old race which is that of blacks.
This theory, along with other racial sciences, was largely published in Europe and would fuel the oppression of blacks by way of prejudice, colonisation, slavery and extermination.
A Eugenics scientist from German called Eigen Fisher put this racial superiority theory to test.
After examining the black, white and mixed race population of the then German colony of Namibia, Fisher concluded that it was in fact the genes of the blacks that were dominant and that of the whites more recessive.
Instead of using this discovery to debunk Darwin’s theory, the whites would use it as a justification of the extermination of blacks so as to preserve that of the whites.
This led to Government-sponsored acts of sterilisation and segregation of blacks in places like the US and Germany in the 19th and early 20th Century.
By the close of the 19th Century, enough books on Eurocentric racial sciences called Eugenics had been read by European scholars throughout Europe to produce a racist generation of leaders.
They came to a conclusion that whites were a superior people to blacks.
This view was shared by the politicians as well as the religious leaders.
The blackman was deemed ‘primitive’ and almost sub-human and the white race new and pure.
This fuelled the European scramble for Africa which was planned out at the infamous Berlin Conference.
What audacity these men had to divide other people’s lands among themselves!
Their self-esteem had been boosted by the rhetoric that was taught to them in the form of Eugenics.
What followed was colonisation which involved the displacing, killing, raping and subjugation of unsuspecting blacks.
By this time, the Portuguese and Spanish had been overtaken by the Dutch, British and French in the field of colonial exploits.
Britain shipped criminals to invade Australia and they almost exterminated the indigenous blacks.
They treated them like animals and would often shoot at them for eating crops and livestock which they assumed to have grown naturally.
They raped their women, killed their leaders and hunted them down like animals in an attempt to annihilate their race.
Britain migrated many of its citizens to Australia to overtake the blacks and to make whites the majority.
Australia also closed its doors to black immigrants from neighbouring islands.
The British further invaded New Zealand and they exterminated the black population of the island of Tasmania.
Not one pure blooded Tasmanian lives as they killed them all save for a few mixed race Tasmanians.
These lands, though in the south-eastern, most parts of the world are being treated as European and the flags of all these European Immigration nations have the red, white and blue colours which are derived from the British flag.
India was a victim of colonisation at about the same time South Africa got invaded by Europeans.
Before the construction of the Suez Canal, whites were travelling to India by way of heading south of the Atlantic Ocean then north-east of the India Ocean.
South Africa began as a stop-off point for European ships that were heading to India for spices and so on.
India suffered a great deal under British colonisation.
In numerous cases, the British settlers upset the traditional growing and harvesting systems of the Indians by stripping them of land rights.
Their produce had to be determined by the white settlers and their priority was not feeding the Indians, but earning money from exporting cash crops.
Unlike most famines which are caused by drought, the famines of India were caused by settler-whites.
In 1770, the region of Bengal lost a total of 10 million people to death by starvation.
The reason being they were not allowed to plant grain for their sustenance but were instead forced to grow opium which Britain was using to make profits in China.
Agricultural tax was set at 50 percent for the Indians and raised to 60 percent when the settlers realised that so many Indians were dying.
This was to further save their pockets and not the Indians.
These famines continued until 1943 when another five million lives were taken by famine.
In total, there were 15 famines that took place because of European engineering and not droughts or other natural causes. In 1943, the cause of the famine was similar to that of previous years.
The British had limited the production of grain in India in favour of cash crops.
However, they had set up Burma as the main producer of rice for the Indian population.
They hoarded the rice and sold it to Indians for profit until Japan overpowered their forces in Burma.
Instead of making a back-up plan for the Indian population, Britain diverted rice supplies and sent them to their already well-fed troops in Asia.
Winston Churchill, president of Britain at that time, commented saying if the Indians are truly dying, why then is Gandhi still alive.
This shows how insensitive whites were towards the people they colonised and many colonies had similar experiences under colonial rule.
The Europeans went after every land with resources, even islands, and settled only by way of violence and domineering. Now they expect the world to simply accept their controversial presence in those lands.
They even go as far as complaining when people from their former colonies immigrate to Europe, yet they feel it is ok for them to still be found in Australia, South Africa and so on.
Whites in the US call themselves ‘Americans’, yet other races are called ‘African-Americans’, ‘Asian-Americans’, ‘Native-Americans’, ‘Latin-Americans’ and so on.
What gives the European the right to consider himself the non-hyphenated American when it is clear that they are Europeans of Irish, English and German stock, among others?
Yet we never hear of them being called ‘German-American’ even though one’s last name may be Hoffman.
The same is true in Australia where the indigenous people are called aborigines and the whites Australians.
The world is being forced to accept this modern-day barbarity of dominating sovereign nations.
Palestine was invaded by Khazarian whites who were never from that region, all under the guise of Judaism which they only knew through conversion.
Before we endorse such notions by accepting them as truth, one should take history and science into account.
History and genetics is against them, so is the hot climate which confines the white settlers in the south to staying indoors under air conditioning during the day.
Others wrap themselves in sheets and those in Australia cannot live comfortably without sunscreen.
Skin cancer is also rampant among settler-whites in the south.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest articles

FOZEU’s call for strike…an attempt at provoking anarchy

By Elizabeth Sitotombe IN an attempt to sow anarch across the country by calling for...

Chitepo’s fight for land

This story was first published on 21/03/2016 By Patience Rusare LAND ranked highest among the grievances...

Winning mindset in post-elections

WE, in the village, are known for our resilience, we never give up and...

Import of US illegal sanctions

By Jonathan N. Moyo TWENTY-ONE years ago, on March 6 2003, US President George W....

More like this

FOZEU’s call for strike…an attempt at provoking anarchy

By Elizabeth Sitotombe IN an attempt to sow anarch across the country by calling for...

Chitepo’s fight for land

This story was first published on 21/03/2016 By Patience Rusare LAND ranked highest among the grievances...

Winning mindset in post-elections

WE, in the village, are known for our resilience, we never give up and...

Discover more from Celebrating Being Zimbabwean

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading