HomeOld_PostsThe ‘new world order’ and genocides against blacks: Part One

The ‘new world order’ and genocides against blacks: Part One

Published on

THE entry of whites into black people’s

lands brought about great suff ering on the

people of colour.

Purely out of prejudice and greed the

dark skin colour has been demonised and

used, fi rstly as reason for the enslavement

of black people and secondly, as justifi cation

for the colonisation of Africa.

Whites generally view black people as

lesser human beings.

In Europe science was used to justify the

poor treatment of black people as a race of

sub-humans.

The disdain towards black people accelerated

after the fall of the Moors of Europe.

The Moors were black people who occupied

southern Europe for over 800 years

and were strongly associated with Islam.

Blacks, particularly those in Africa, were

possessors of great wealth in the form of

land and natural resources.

The desire to control this great wealth

became another reason for the Europeans

to suppress the black people and the people

of India and the Americas.

The Europeans also sought to use black

people as cheap and free labour to build

their cities and industries.

To achieve this, the Europeans employed

every tactic to justify the ill-treatment of

black people.

Books were written by people such as

Charles Darwin using science to demonstrate

the inferiority of the black man to

the whiteman.

The superiority of the white man was

presented as God-given.

The black man was created by God to

serve the white man.

Scientifi c racism was developed through

a fi eld of study called ‘Eugenics’.

The mad ‘science’ which started shortly

after the monarchs of Spain and Portugal

defeated the Moors reached its peak in the

19th century.

The term ‘new world order’ was introduced

when Europeans moved to settle in

the Americas after Christopher Columbus’

infamous conquests on that continent.

Whites called the American continent

‘the new world’.

They would eventually try to kill all the

indigenous people of the Americas .

The Europeans sent thousands upon

thousands of raiders called conquistadors

on ships and they spent the fi rst 50 years

of their stay in America, killing off all the

blacks they could fi nd.

Besides killing them as a way of eliminating

evidence of their existence in the

lands of the Americas prior to the coming

of Europeans, the whites would also rape

the black women and commit miscegenation

with their black slaves to produce

off spring of a mixed race.

This would result in the emergence of

the Latino population which is now spread

out in the Americas, especially in South

America.

The blacks that survived the slaughter

by the conquistadors would eventually be

stripped of their right to land ownership

and citizenship in the Americas.

Their descendants would be tricked into

believing that they were brought from Africa

as slaves when in actual fact, they had

been the indigenous people of the Americas

and their ancestors had voluntarily

settled in those lands thousands of years

before the Mongols from Asia had crossed

the bearing strait.

Nowadays, people wrongly perceive the

so-called Red Indians to be the ones that

were massacred in millions by the whites

when it was in fact the blacks.

These blacks were known by the following

names; Quetzalcoatl, Washaw,

Washataw Moors and simply Indians; that

is before they were called Negros.

They were as black-skinned as the African,

with kinky wooly hair which they kept

as locks, particularly the priests and kings.

To deprive them of their rights as citizens,

the whites sought to paint them with

the same brush as the Africans that were

later shipped and enslaved from Africa

during the transatlantic slave kidnappings

and trade.

There is actually no ‘Red’ Indians in

America.

The people generally referred as such

who were the victims of the Columbus

and conquistador massacres are Mongols

who were always thinly populated in the

Americas.

The vast majority of the artifacts and

relics of those lands prove that the larger

parts of the Americas were inhabited by

blacks.

Although the descendants of these blacks

still exist in those very lands in millions,

the whites have fooled them into thinking

that their history began with slavery.

The mixed race crop of people created

through miscegenation between the people

originally from the countries of southern

Europe such as Italy, Portugal and Spain

and the black indigenous Americans can

still be found in Argentina, Puerto Rico,

Mexico, Panama, Colombia, Uruguay,

Brazil, Cuba and so on.

They are known as Latinos because they

inherited the languages of their Latin forefathers

and today Spanish and Portuguese

are the two most spoken languages in

South America.

Since the days of Alexander of Greece,

miscegenation has been used as a way of

killing the black race.

Although there is no death when whites

mix with blacks, the phenotype of the

off spring becomes estranged to its own

people and this creates diff erences in a

race that was supposed to be identical and

united.

This causes division and confl ict

amongst blacks and also an inevitable

connection between the mixed race people

and their white fathers, a situation that is

favourable to the Europeans.

Thus, miscegenation between blacks and

whites is a weapon that has been used by

whites against the black people and can

be described as an act of genetic genocide,

considering that the Europeans usually

forced it on blacks.

The Europeans in most cases promoted

miscegenation through raping black

women after slaughtering their men.

The Latina people of mixed race, like the

Arab people of mixed race eventually stuck

to marrying other mixed race people and

this produced the mullato (coloured) race

we call Latina today.

With the current social hierarchy which

has been set up by the Europeans through

colonisation and slavery, the blacks usually

end up being the ones that are alienated

against by their off spring of mixed race.

In America today, black on brown

(Latina) hatred and crime is rampant and

the two groups do not usually go along.

However, one thing the groups do have

in common is that they are both placed

under the whites in the American social

hierarchy or new world order, thus sharing

a common situation of being poor and

neglected, which ironically limits their differences

and causes many of them to live

together and even intermarry.

1 COMMENT

  1. ‘We’ we’re then and till this day are a proud people, stiff neck no proud yes…there will (and I believe this to be true) never be civility between us and them we are two totally different people and until these people respect us as race of human being then it’ll never change.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest articles

Plot to derail debt restructuring talks

THE US has been caught in yet another embarrassing plot to grab the limelight...

US onslaught on Zim continues

By Elizabeth Sitotombe THERE was nothing surprising about Tendai Biti’s decision to abandon the opposition's...

Mineral wealth a definition of Independence

ZIMBABWE’S independence and freedom cannot be fully explained without mentioning one of the key...

Let the Uhuru celebrations begin

By Kundai Marunya The Independence Flame has departed Harare’s Kopje area for a tour of...

More like this

Plot to derail debt restructuring talks

THE US has been caught in yet another embarrassing plot to grab the limelight...

US onslaught on Zim continues

By Elizabeth Sitotombe THERE was nothing surprising about Tendai Biti’s decision to abandon the opposition's...

Mineral wealth a definition of Independence

ZIMBABWE’S independence and freedom cannot be fully explained without mentioning one of the key...

Discover more from Celebrating Being Zimbabwean

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading