By Nthungo YaAfrica
THE academic and intellectual world says the Greeks civilised the world, yet the opposite is the truth.
The Greeks were students of our ancestors, Egyptians Nahasis (black Africans), that is why our ancestors called them ‘mere children’.
Academic and intellectual development can only happen in a peaceful and stable environment, which was the case with Egypt and not Greece as their history will show.
This is a brief history of the era that so-called Greek philosophy was said to have developed.
In the book Stolen Legacy, G.M. James writes: “It is supposed to have developed between 640 to 322 BC, yet this was a period of internal and external wars and was therefore not fit for producing philosophy.
History supports the fact that from the time of Thales to the time of Aristole, the Greeks were victims of internal disunity, on one hand, while on the other, they lived in constant fear of invasion from the Persians who were common enemy of the city States.”
From Cheik Anta Diop’s book, Civilisation or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology, the deceit of Archimedes the Greek is exposed.
The book shows undeniable connections between Egyptian mathematics and so-called Greek discoverers like Archimedes and Pythagoras, to name just a few.
Archimedes is the greatest representative of Greek Tambou (white) supremacists and a plagiarist. Egyptian papyrus, called Moscow Scrolls, show mathematics and how one can do calculations and these were published by V.V. Struve.
The international scientific community knows with certainty that 2 000 years before Archimedes, the Egyptians had already established the rigorous formulae of the area of the sphere.
The Rhind papyrus published by T. Erick Peet shows that the Egyptians also knew the formulae for volume of the cylinder and the constant ratio between the area of a circle and its diameter.
The papyrus of Moscow and that of the Rhind show that Egyptians knew the mathematics of the pyramid, cone and used geometric, trigonometric lines, the tangent, the sine, the cosine, the cotangent in order to calculate the slopes of the pyramids.
This was 2 000 years before the Greeks had any knowledge of these calculations.
But this did not stop Archimedes from writing to the geometrician Dasetheus that it is Eudosais of Cnidus to whom they owed the measurement of the pyramids and the cone.
Incidentally Eudosais and Plato were former pupils of the Egyptian priests at Heliopolis and these were given credit for Egyptian mathematics inventions 2 000 years before they were born.
In fact, the cube and the pyramid, among others, are also part of the basic volumes improperly ‘baptised’ Platonic bodies of work.
Struve shows that it’s the Egyptian mathematicians who established the rigorous formulae for the area of the sphere.
Now a sphere inscribed in a right angle cylinder of a height equal to the diameter of the sphere is the same figure that Archimedes chose in his epitaph, considering that was his best discovery.
This shows Archimedes as being a dishonest scholar who rediscovers something discovered by the Egyptians. During his numerous voyages to Egypt, he indulged himself in the sciences of the land and when he returned back home, he claimed they were his discoveries.
He was just following Greek tradition of plagiarism that went back to Thales, Pythagoras, Plato, Eudoxus, Oenopides and Aristotle, among a host of other charlatans.
Archimedes, in one of his books, in calculating the value pi=3,14 did not make any reference to the very close value of pi=3,16 found by Egyptians 2 000 years before him.
He did not suspect that an Egyptian papyrus would accidentally reveal the truth in posterity.
Archimedes does not explicitly calculate the value of 3,1416, but shows that the ratio of the circumference to the diameter lies between 3,1/7 and 3,10/70.
The best approximation found by the Babylonians was ‘3’ (a whole number) or else 3,8.
His treatise, titled ‘On the Equilibrium of the Planes or of their Centre of Gravity’, deals with the equilibrium of the lever, a problem that the Egyptians had mastered in 2600 BC, the era of the construction of the pyramids.
For a people to elevate a five million-tonne stone monument to a 148-meter height comprised of blocks of several tonnes, such people had to have solid knowledge of mechanics and, above all, of statics.
Egyptian plans are as correct as those of so-called modern engineers.
The first three propositions of Archimedes’ book on the equilibrium of planes consider a lever of weighty bodies hanging at each of its extremities and a point of support. He then successfully establishes that, when the arms of the lever are equal, the weights are supposedly in balance at an unequal distance from the point of support, the heaviest weight corresponding to the shortest distance.
The shaduf (1500 BC) was already a mechanical application in Archimedes’ sense of the lever with unequal arms.
Also, Archimedes did not invent the continuous screw as it was invented centuries before his birth.
The Greeks should have been honest to admit that they inherited their technology from the Egyptian masters they had conquered and by not doing so, they failed to observe the elementary rule of intellectual honesty.
Incidentally, the Greek nation is 3 000 years younger than that of the Egyptians.
The above clearly shows why our ancestors called Greeks ‘mere children’, for it shows that the Greeks were enlightened by our ancestors.
I had to go to great lengths in quoting from Cheik Anta Diop’s book to show that what is called white civilisation is actually black civilisation.
The education system currently on the motherland hypocritically teaches that Greeks civilised the world and we, the blacks, without the whites, would be like wild animals, so we must be forever be thankful to Yahweh for creating whites!
If then, more than 2 000 years later, whites are not even ashamed of their academic as well as intellectual dishonesty and are not even prepared to acknowledge their deceit, how can one trust the truth of their translation and interpretations of the Way of Yahweh, which they corrupted and named the Holy Bible?
In Mathew 16:Verses 6-12 and Mark 8: Verse 15, Yeshua warns the Apostles about the teachings of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Herod; this being so because even in Yeshua’s time, the Way of Yahweh had long been corrupted by Greek philosophy, having started in 322 BC after the conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great and from 84 BC when Greece was conquered by Rome to date.
That is why Jewish teachers, like Nicodemus, had to visit Yeshua by night in order to know the uncorrupted truth that was being preached by Yeshua (Mark 3: Verses 1-10). The Greeks and Romans had corrupted the Way of Yahweh in such a way that the Jewish religion was now about the philosophy of: ‘I, me and myself’, culminating in Yeshua preaching about the great commandment in Matthew 22: Verses 37-38, the backbone and foundation of the original Way of Yahweh.
I have been vilified for saying that the Holy Bible was corrupted to enslave us mentally, spiritual and physically, despite evidence from the above and also of Lord Macaulay’s address, King Leopold II’s letter and now Archimedes deceit.
Who is being fooled here by the three evils from whites and for what reasons?
What must we do as a race?
The answer is in Matthew 7: Verses 7-8.
Sixty-five years after Ghana attained independence, Africans are worse off than when we were colonised. Someone once said post-colonial Africans will love and worship whites more than the pre-colonial Africans.
Is it the fault of the post-colonial African?
The answer is ‘no’, but the three evils the pre-colonial African academics, intellectuals and politicians carried over into independence are still among us (namely Western religion, education and politics).
Books by authors, like G.M. James, Cheik Anta Diop, Professor Ayi Kwei Armah and others like-minded, are usually not found in African universities for reasons best known to African university administrators.
If 65 years after Ghana got independent we have black African universities that worship Greek philosophy, the future is extremely bleak for the continent and literally shows that we are the people whites wanted us to be — the Lord Macaulay way, according to his address to the British Parliament in 1835.
By being physically independent, but mentally enslaved, one becomes a person with multiplicity illusions as mental slavery is invisible violence, thus creating a person who lacks self-knowledge and confidence in his/her race.
Our ancestors, who called the Greeks ‘mere children’, must be turning in their graves as the descendants of the mere children are making their descendants continuously run away from their shadows.
We are in limbo as were are fighting among ourselves to defend white sacred and secular philosophies among us. The modern African Kwame Nkrumah envisioned in 1957 will never materialise because the modern African is bewitched and hypnotised by whites’ way of life and thought.
For how long shall we continue to sit by the rivers of Babylon (Psalm 137) while we are in a continent of unparalleled wealth, but beset by unparalleled poverty, frustration and despondence, created by just failing to unite and become one people?
Nthungo YaAfrika, aka J.L. Mtembo is a Hamite who strongly believes in the motherland renaissance.
For views and comments, email: lovemoremtutuzeli@gmail.com
Nthungo yaAfrika, aka J.L. Mtembo is a Hamite who strongly believes in the motherland renaissance.
For views and comments, email: lovemoremtutuzeli@gmail.com
